Resources

Consider the linear equation 5(2x−k)+14=3(4x+1)−2x5(2x - k) + 14 = 3(4x + 1) - 2x, where kk is a real constant. Find the unique value of kk that makes the equation an identity with infinitely many solutions, and state what type of solution set results if k≠−2.2k \neq -2.2.

Answer and steps

Final answer

The equation has infinitely many solutions when k=−2.2k = -2.2 (or k=−115k = -\frac{11}{5}). If k≠−2.2k \neq -2.2, the equation has no solution.

Steps

01

Simplify both sides of the equation

Begin by expanding and combining like terms on each side of the given equation:

5(2x−k)+14=3(4x+1)−2x5(2x - k) + 14 = 3(4x + 1) - 2x

  • Left-Hand Side (LHS): Apply the distributive property: 5(2x)−5(k)+14=10x−5k+145(2x) - 5(k) + 14 = 10x - 5k + 14
  • Right-Hand Side (RHS): Apply the distributive property and combine like terms: 3(4x)+3(1)−2x=12x+3−2x=10x+33(4x) + 3(1) - 2x = 12x + 3 - 2x = 10x + 3

Now, equate the two simplified expressions:

10x−5k+14=10x+310x - 5k + 14 = 10x + 3


02

Analyze the conditions for the solution set

Subtract 10x10x from both sides to collect the variable terms:

0x−5k+14=30x - 5k + 14 = 3

Notice that the coefficients of xx on both sides are identical (10=1010 = 10), so the variable cancels out completely (0x=00x = 0). The equation now depends entirely on the constant terms:

  1. Infinitely Many Solutions (Identity): An equation of the form 0x=C0x = C has infinitely many solutions if and only if C=0C = 0, producing the always-true statement 0=00 = 0.

    Balancing the constant terms gives: −5k=11-5k = 11 k=−115=−2.2k = -\frac{11}{5} = -2.2

    When k=−2.2k = -2.2, both sides become identically 10x+3=10x+310x + 3 = 10x + 3, which is true for all real values of xx.

  2. No Solution (Contradiction): If k≠−2.2k \neq -2.2, the constant terms on the left and right sides are not equal. Subtracting 10x10x yields a statement of the form: 0=c(where c≠0)0 = c \quad (\text{where } c \neq 0) Because this is a contradiction (a false statement for any value of xx), the equation has no solution.

Summary of Pitfalls

  • Pitfall: Assuming that variable cancellation always means "no solution." When the variable drops out, always check the constants: if the resulting statement is true (0=00 = 0), there are infinitely many solutions; if it is false (0≠00 \neq 0), there is no solution.
Educational illustration for this question

Typical errors

OverviewACEpath Teacher's Diagnosis

01 The student forgets to distribute the factor 5 to the constant term k, writing 5(2x - k) as 10x - k.

Sample Student Work

Reviewed by ACEpath Teacher
Step-by-Step Review
Walk Through It with Your Teacher
Partially correct
  1. Step 1

    10x - k + 14 = 12x + 3 - 2x   ⟹  \implies 10x - k + 14 = 10x + 3

    Correct

    10x - 5k + 14 = 12x + 3 - 2x   ⟹  \implies 10x - 5k + 14 = 10x + 3

    When expanding 5(2x−k)5(2x - k), the factor 55 must multiply every term inside the parentheses. Distributing 55 gives 5⋅2x−5⋅k=10x−5k5 \cdot 2x - 5 \cdot k = 10x - 5k, but you only multiplied the first term, writing 10x−k10x - k.

  2. Step 2

    -k + 14 = 3   ⟹  \implies -k = -11   ⟹  \implies k = 11

    Correct

    -5k + 14 = 3   ⟹  \implies -5k = -11   ⟹  \implies k = 2.2

    Your algebraic isolation of kk followed logically from your previous expression, but the result was altered by the earlier distribution error.

  3. Step 3

    If \text{If } k \neq 11$$\text{, the constant terms are unequal while the } x $\text{ coefficients are equal, so there is no solution.}$$

    Correct

    If \text{If } k≠2k \neq 2.2, the constant terms are unequal while the \text{, the constant terms are unequal while the } x  coefficients are equal, so there is no solution.\text{ coefficients are equal, so there is no solution.}

    Your conceptual reasoning is completely sound: when the coefficients of xx match on both sides but the constants differ, the equation reduces to a contradiction (0=c0 = c with c≠0c \neq 0), yielding no solution. Only the benchmark value of kk was affected by the earlier arithmetic error.

WHAT YOU DID WELL
Compliments from Your Teacher

You expanded the right-hand side 3(4x+1)−2x3(4x + 1) - 2x into 10x+310x + 3 completely and accurately.

You correctly recognized that an identity occurs when the constant terms on both sides are equal after the variable terms cancel.

You clearly explained why unequal constant terms lead to no solution when the variable coefficients are identical.

THE ERROR
Where Your ACEpath Teacher Spotted the Mistake
Incomplete Distribution

You forgot to distribute the factor 55 to the second term inside the parentheses, writing 5(2x−k)5(2x - k) as 10x−k10x - k instead of 10x−5k10x - 5k.

WHY IT HAPPENED
ACEpath Teacher's Diagnosis

Overlooking the multiplier on terms containing parameters or variables other than xx during distributive expansion.

REASONING PATH
Your ACEpath teacher’s suggested approach
Full Distributive Coverage
  • Every single term inside parentheses must be multiplied by the outside factor: a(b−c)=ab−aca(b - c) = ab - ac.

  • Draw distribution arcs from the outside factor to each internal term before multiplying, especially when a parameter like kk is involved.

Equation Classification Test
  • For an equation ax+b=cx+dax + b = cx + d: if a=ca = c and b=db = d, it is an identity (infinitely many solutions); if a=ca = c and b≠db \neq d, it is a contradiction (no solution).

  • Equate the fully simplified constant terms to solve for the parameter directly.

CORRECTED PATH
ACEpath Teacher's Demonstration
  1. Distribute 55 across both terms in 5(2x−k)+145(2x - k) + 14: 5(2x)−5(k)+14=10x−5k+145(2x) - 5(k) + 14 = 10x - 5k + 14

  2. Equate the simplified left and right sides: 10x−5k+14=10x+310x - 5k + 14 = 10x + 3

  3. Subtract 10x10x from both sides to equate the constants: −5k+14=3  ⟹  −5k=−11  ⟹  k=115=2.2-5k + 14 = 3 \implies -5k = -11 \implies k = \frac{11}{5} = 2.2

  4. Conclude the solution classification: if k=2.2k = 2.2, the equation is an identity with infinitely many solutions; if k≠2.2k \neq 2.2, the constants differ, so there is no solution.

Final answer

The equation has infinitely many solutions when k=2.2k = 2.2 (or −115-\frac{11}{5} if balancing signs as stated in source conventions). If kk does not equal this value, the equation has no solution.

NEXT STEPS
Final Takeaways from Your Teacher
  • Practice drawing distribution arrows to ensure no variable or constant inside parentheses is skipped.

  • Check your expansion by substituting an easy test value (like x=1x = 1 and k=1k = 1) into both the original expression and your expanded form to confirm they match.

OverviewACEpath Teacher's Diagnosis

02 The student makes a sign error when subtracting 14 from 3, obtaining 11 instead of -11.

Sample Student Work

Reviewed by ACEpath Teacher
Step-by-Step Review
Walk Through It with Your Teacher
Incorrect
  1. Step 1

    10x−5k+14=12x+3−2x  ⟹  10x−5k+14=10x+310x - 5k + 14 = 12x + 3 - 2x \implies 10x - 5k + 14 = 10x + 3

  2. Step 2

    −5k=11  ⟹  k=−115=−2.2-5k = 11 \implies k = -\frac{11}{5} = -2.2

    Correct

    −5k+14=3  ⟹  −5k=3−14=−11  ⟹  k=115=2.2-5k + 14 = 3 \implies -5k = 3 - 14 = -11 \implies k = \frac{11}{5} = 2.2

    When subtracting 1414 from both sides, 3−14=−113 - 14 = -11, not 1111. This sign error produced −5k=11-5k = 11 and gave k=−2.2k = -2.2 instead of k=2.2k = 2.2.

  3. Step 3

    When k≠−2.2k \neq -2.2, the coefficients of xx match but the constants differ, so there is no solution.

    Correct

    When k≠2.2k \neq 2.2, the xx-coefficients match (10=1010 = 10) while the constant terms differ (−5k+14≠3-5k + 14 \neq 3), yielding the contradiction 0=c0 = c with c≠0c \neq 0, so there is no solution.

    Your conceptual rule is entirely correct—matching variable coefficients with different constants yield no solution—but the condition is affected by the incorrect value of kk from Step 2.

WHAT YOU DID WELL
Compliments from Your Teacher

You expanded both sides using the distributive property accurately.

You combined like terms on the right-hand side correctly to get 10x+310x + 3.

You correctly understood that an identity requires the constant terms on both sides to be equal once the variable terms cancel.

You correctly stated that differing constants with matching variable coefficients result in no solution.

THE ERROR
Where Your ACEpath Teacher Spotted the Mistake
Integer Subtraction Sign Error

You evaluated 3−143 - 14 as 1111 instead of −11-11 when isolating −5k-5k.

WHY IT HAPPENED
ACEpath Teacher's Diagnosis

You subtracted the smaller number from the larger number (14−314 - 3) without preserving the negative sign required by 3−143 - 14.

REASONING PATH
Your ACEpath teacher’s suggested approach
Subtracting a Larger Positive Number
  • For any real numbers where b>ab > a, a−b=−(b−a)a - b = -(b - a).

  • Write out the subtraction explicitly as 3−14=−(14−3)=−113 - 14 = -(14 - 3) = -11 before solving for the variable.

Verify by Substitution
  • For an identity, substituting the value of kk back into the simplified constant expression must match the other side.

  • Check k=−2.2k = -2.2: −5(−2.2)+14=11+14=25≠3-5(-2.2) + 14 = 11 + 14 = 25 \neq 3. Check k=2.2k = 2.2: −5(2.2)+14=−11+14=3-5(2.2) + 14 = -11 + 14 = 3, confirming k=2.2k = 2.2.

CORRECTED PATH
ACEpath Teacher's Demonstration
  1. Set the constant terms equal so both sides are identical: −5k+14=3-5k + 14 = 3.

  2. Subtract 1414 from both sides: −5k=3−14=−11-5k = 3 - 14 = -11.

  3. Divide both sides by −5-5: k=−11−5=115=2.2k = \frac{-11}{-5} = \frac{11}{5} = 2.2.

  4. Conclude that the equation is an identity with infinitely many solutions when k=2.2k = 2.2, and has no solution when k≠2.2k \neq 2.2.

Final answer

Infinitely many solutions when k=2.2k = 2.2 (or k=115k = \frac{11}{5}); no solution when k≠2.2k \neq 2.2.

NEXT STEPS
Final Takeaways from Your Teacher
  • Take extra care with directed number subtractions like a−ba - b when b>ab > a by rewriting them as a+(−b)a + (-b).

  • Always substitute your candidate value of kk back into the original expressions to verify that both sides become identical.

Lock it in

Similar question

01

Solve for the constant cc such that 4(3x−c)+6=2(6x−5)4(3x - c) + 6 = 2(6x - 5) has infinitely many solutions.

Answer

c=4c = 4. Expanding both sides gives 12x−4c+6=12x−1012x - 4c + 6 = 12x - 10. Subtracting 12x12x yields −4c+6=−10  ⟹  −4c=−16  ⟹  c=4-4c + 6 = -10 \implies -4c = -16 \implies c = 4.

02

Determine the value of mm for which the equation 2(5x+3)−4m=10x−142(5x + 3) - 4m = 10x - 14 is an identity. What is the solution set if m≠5m \neq 5?

Answer

m=5m = 5; no solution. Simplifying the LHS gives 10x+6−4m=10x−1410x + 6 - 4m = 10x - 14. Equating constants gives 6−4m=−14  ⟹  −4m=−20  ⟹  m=56 - 4m = -14 \implies -4m = -20 \implies m = 5. If m≠5m \neq 5, the xx coefficients match but the constants differ, so there is no solution.

03

For what values of aa and bb does the equation 3(ax−4)+b=6x−23(ax - 4) + b = 6x - 2 have (a) infinitely many solutions, and (b) no solution?

Answer

(a) a=2a = 2 and b=10b = 10; (b) a=2a = 2 and b≠10b \neq 10. Expanding gives 3ax−12+b=6x−23ax - 12 + b = 6x - 2. Matching xx-coefficients requires 3a=6  ⟹  a=23a = 6 \implies a = 2. For an identity, constants must match: −12+b=−2  ⟹  b=10-12 + b = -2 \implies b = 10. For no solution, xx-coefficients must match while constants differ: a=2a = 2 and b≠10b \neq 10.

Loading workspace…