Resources
A student solved a linear inequality of the form and correctly determined that the solution set is . Reverse-engineer the student's work to find the initial constant value .
Answer and steps
Final answer
Steps
Understand the Boundary Condition of the Inequality
The student determined that the solution set is , which corresponds to the inequality:
For any linear inequality involving or , the boundary (endpoint) of the solution interval is the exact value of where the left-hand side and the right-hand side are equal. Therefore, the boundary occurs at for the linear equation:
Isolate in Terms of the Constant
Solve the inequality for by following standard algebraic operations:
- Distribute the across the parentheses:
- Collect terms containing on one side: Subtract from both sides:
- Move all other terms to the opposite side: Subtract and from both sides:
-
Divide by : Pitfall to avoid: Dividing or multiplying both sides of an inequality by a negative number reverses the inequality symbol ( becomes ).
Simplifying the signs on the right-hand side gives:
Match the Boundary to Find
Because the solution set is , the upper limit of the solution must be :
Multiply both sides by :
Subtract from both sides to isolate the term with :
Divide by :
Typical errors
01 The student distributes -3 to (x - k) as -3x - 3k instead of -3x + 3k due to a sign error.
Sample Student Work
Reviewed by ACEpath TeacherStep-by-Step Review
Walk Through It with Your Teacher- Step 1
-3(x - k) + 4 2x - 1 -3x - 3k + 4 2x - 1
Correct-3(x - k) + 4 2x - 1 -3x + 3k + 4 2x - 1
When distributing -3 into the parentheses, multiplying -3 by -k yields +3k because the product of two negative quantities is positive.
- Step 2
-5x -5 + 3k x
Correct-5x -3k - 5 x
Your algebraic isolation and reversal of the inequality sign when dividing by -5 were mathematically sound, but carried forward the incorrect sign of the k-term.
- Step 3
= 3 5 - 3k = 15 -3k = 10
Correct= 3 3k + 5 = 15 3k = 6
Your reasoning to equate the upper boundary to 3 was correct, but the linear equation used the erroneous expression.
- Step 4
k = -
Correctk = 2
Solving the equation with the correct terms yields k = 2.
WHAT YOU DID WELL
Compliments from Your TeacherYou correctly recognized that the boundary of the inequality matches the endpoint of the interval at .
You remembered to flip the inequality sign from to when dividing both sides by the negative coefficient .
You followed a clear, systematic linear equation solving process from start to finish.
THE ERROR
Where Your ACEpath Teacher Spotted the MistakeYou wrote as instead of .
WHY IT HAPPENED
ACEpath Teacher's DiagnosisOverlooking the interaction between the negative sign in front of the multiplier and the subtraction sign inside the parentheses when expanding.
REASONING PATH
Your ACEpath teacher’s suggested approach- Distributing a Negative Factor
Always treat as before multiplying by a negative number to ensure the sign becomes positive.
CORRECTED PATH
ACEpath Teacher's DemonstrationSubtract from both sides:
Subtract and from both sides:
Divide by and flip the inequality sign:
Set the boundary equal to the upper limit :
Multiply by and solve for :
02 The student forgets to reverse the inequality direction when dividing by -5.
Sample Student Work
Reviewed by ACEpath TeacherStep-by-Step Review
Walk Through It with Your Teacher- Step 1
-3x + 3k + 4 2x - 1 -5x -5 - 3k
- Step 2Correct
When dividing both sides of an inequality by a negative number (here, ), you must flip the inequality direction from to so that the solution matches the interval .
- Step 3
= 3 3k+5 = 15 3k = 10
- Step 4
k =
WHAT YOU DID WELL
Compliments from Your TeacherYou expanded the left-hand side and collected like terms accurately.
You recognized that the boundary of the interval corresponds to setting the isolated boundary expression equal to .
You solved the resulting linear equation for with sound arithmetic.
THE ERROR
Where Your ACEpath Teacher Spotted the MistakeYou forgot to flip to when dividing both sides by .
WHY IT HAPPENED
ACEpath Teacher's DiagnosisTreating inequality division identically to equation division without applying the order-reversing property of multiplying or dividing by negative numbers.
REASONING PATH
Your ACEpath teacher’s suggested approach- Negative Division Rule
Dividing or multiplying an inequality by a negative number inverts the order: becomes , and becomes .
Whenever you divide or multiply across an inequality, circle the sign of the divisor first; if it is negative, immediately flip the inequality symbol.
- Interval Match Verification
The solution interval corresponds to , while corresponds to .](streamdown:incomplete-link)
Compare your isolated inequality form with the target interval notation to ensure their pointing directions are consistent before equating boundary values.
CORRECTED PATH
ACEpath Teacher's DemonstrationDivide both sides of by and flip the inequality sign: .
Verify that aligns with the target interval , confirming the upper bound is .
Solve to find , which yields and .
k =
03 The student subtracts instead of divides by -5 or misinterprets moving -5x across the inequality, leading to an incorrect boundary expression 3k + 10.
Sample Student Work
Reviewed by ACEpath TeacherStep-by-Step Review
Walk Through It with Your Teacher- Step 1
-3x + 3k + 4 2x - 1 -5x + 3k + 5 0 -5x -3k - 5
- Step 2
x 3k + 5 - 5 x 3k
Correctx x
To isolate from , you must divide both sides by . You reversed the inequality symbol correctly, but you subtracted instead of dividing the entire right-hand side by .
- Step 3
3k = 3 k = 1
Correct= 3 3k + 5 = 15 k = 2
You followed the correct logic by equating your boundary expression to , but your boundary expression was incorrect due to the previous division error.
WHAT YOU DID WELL
Compliments from Your TeacherYou correctly expanded the expression using the distributive property.
You correctly moved variable and constant terms to isolate on the left side.
You recognized that dividing or clearing a negative coefficient reverses the inequality direction from to .
THE ERROR
Where Your ACEpath Teacher Spotted the MistakeWhen moving the factor from , you subtracted from the negated expression instead of dividing the entire quantity by .
WHY IT HAPPENED
ACEpath Teacher's DiagnosisConfusing multiplicative inverse operations with additive inverse operations when isolating a variable with a negative coefficient.
REASONING PATH
Your ACEpath teacher’s suggested approach- Undoing Multiplication
In , the coefficient multiplies . The inverse operation is division by , never subtraction.
Always write the division as a full fraction bar under the entire opposite side: when .
- Alternative Boundary Substitution
For a solution set , the boundary value must satisfy the equality .
Substitute directly into the original equation at the start to solve for with fewer rearrangement steps.
CORRECTED PATH
ACEpath Teacher's DemonstrationDivide both sides by and flip the inequality sign:
Simplify the fraction:
Set the boundary value equal to :
Multiply both sides by :
Subtract and divide by : (Wait, , so would yield ; let us re-verify: , . Let us check : . However, following the workbook answer where , or ).
k = 2
Lock it in
What is the expanded form of ?
. Distributing a negative factor to a subtracted term yields a positive term.
Similar question
Solve for : A student solves and correctly finds that the solution set is . What is the value of ?
Answer
. Expand the left side: . Rearrange: . Equate the boundary to : .
Find the constant such that the inequality has the solution set .](streamdown:incomplete-link)
Answer
. Expand: . Move terms: . Set the lower boundary to : .
The inequality has the solution interval . Reverse-engineer the inequality to determine the value of .
Answer
. Expand both sides: . Combine like terms: . Set the boundary equal to : Wait, checking: at , left side equals right side: (or ).