Resources

A student solved a linear inequality of the form −3(x−k)+4≥2x−1-3(x - k) + 4 \ge 2x - 1 and correctly determined that the solution set is (−∞,3](-\infty, 3]. Reverse-engineer the student's work to find the initial constant value kk.

Answer and steps

Final answer

k=2k = 2

Steps

01

Understand the Boundary Condition of the Inequality

The student determined that the solution set is (−∞,3](-\infty, 3], which corresponds to the inequality: x≤3x \le 3

For any linear inequality involving ≤\le or ≥\ge, the boundary (endpoint) of the solution interval is the exact value of xx where the left-hand side and the right-hand side are equal. Therefore, the boundary occurs at x=3x = 3 for the linear equation: −3(x−k)+4=2x−1-3(x - k) + 4 = 2x - 1


02

Isolate xx in Terms of the Constant kk

Solve the inequality for xx by following standard algebraic operations:

  1. Distribute the −3-3 across the parentheses: −3x+3k+4≥2x−1-3x + 3k + 4 \ge 2x - 1
  2. Collect terms containing xx on one side: Subtract 2x2x from both sides: −5x+3k+4≥−1-5x + 3k + 4 \ge -1
  3. Move all other terms to the opposite side: Subtract 3k3k and 44 from both sides: −5x≥−3k−5-5x \ge -3k - 5
  4. Divide by −5-5: Pitfall to avoid: Dividing or multiplying both sides of an inequality by a negative number reverses the inequality symbol (≥\ge becomes ≤\le). x≤−3k−5−5x \le \frac{-3k - 5}{-5}

    Simplifying the signs on the right-hand side gives: x≤3k+55x \le \frac{3k + 5}{5}


03

Match the Boundary to Find kk

Because the solution set is (−∞,3](-\infty, 3], the upper limit of the solution must be 33: 3k+55=3\frac{3k + 5}{5} = 3

Multiply both sides by 55: 3k+5=153k + 5 = 15

Subtract 55 from both sides to isolate the term with kk: 3k=63k = 6

Divide by 33: k=2k = 2

Educational illustration for this question

Typical errors

OverviewACEpath Teacher's Diagnosis

01 The student distributes -3 to (x - k) as -3x - 3k instead of -3x + 3k due to a sign error.

Sample Student Work

Reviewed by ACEpath Teacher
Step-by-Step Review
Walk Through It with Your Teacher
Incorrect
  1. Step 1

    -3(x - k) + 4 ≥\ge 2x - 1   ⟹  \implies -3x - 3k + 4 ≥\ge 2x - 1

    Correct

    -3(x - k) + 4 ≥\ge 2x - 1   ⟹  \implies -3x + 3k + 4 ≥\ge 2x - 1

    When distributing -3 into the parentheses, multiplying -3 by -k yields +3k because the product of two negative quantities is positive.

  2. Step 2

    -5x ≥\ge -5 + 3k   ⟹  \implies x ≤\le 5−3k5\frac{5 - 3k}{5}

    Correct

    -5x ≥\ge -3k - 5   ⟹  \implies x ≤\le 3k+55\frac{3k + 5}{5}

    Your algebraic isolation and reversal of the inequality sign when dividing by -5 were mathematically sound, but carried forward the incorrect sign of the k-term.

  3. Step 3

    5−3k5\frac{5 - 3k}{5} = 3   ⟹  \implies 5 - 3k = 15   ⟹  \implies -3k = 10

    Correct

    3k+55\frac{3k + 5}{5} = 3   ⟹  \implies 3k + 5 = 15   ⟹  \implies 3k = 6

    Your reasoning to equate the upper boundary to 3 was correct, but the linear equation used the erroneous expression.

  4. Step 4

    k = -103\frac{10}{3}

    Correct

    k = 2

    Solving the equation with the correct terms yields k = 2.

WHAT YOU DID WELL
Compliments from Your Teacher

You correctly recognized that the boundary of the inequality matches the endpoint of the interval at x=3x = 3.

You remembered to flip the inequality sign from ≥\ge to ≤\le when dividing both sides by the negative coefficient −5-5.

You followed a clear, systematic linear equation solving process from start to finish.

THE ERROR
Where Your ACEpath Teacher Spotted the Mistake
Distributive Sign Error

You wrote −3(x−k)-3(x - k) as −3x−3k-3x - 3k instead of −3x+3k-3x + 3k.

WHY IT HAPPENED
ACEpath Teacher's Diagnosis

Overlooking the interaction between the negative sign in front of the multiplier and the subtraction sign inside the parentheses when expanding.

REASONING PATH
Your ACEpath teacher’s suggested approach
Distributing a Negative Factor
  • −a(b−c)=−a⋅b−(−a⋅c)=−ab+ac-a(b - c) = -a \cdot b - (-a \cdot c) = -ab + ac

  • Always treat (b−c)(b - c) as b+(−c)b + (-c) before multiplying by a negative number to ensure the sign becomes positive.

CORRECTED PATH
ACEpath Teacher's Demonstration
  1. Subtract 2x2x from both sides: −5x+3k+4≥−1-5x + 3k + 4 \ge -1

  2. Subtract 3k3k and 44 from both sides: −5x≥−3k−5-5x \ge -3k - 5

  3. Divide by −5-5 and flip the inequality sign: x≤3k+55x \le \frac{3k + 5}{5}

  4. Set the boundary equal to the upper limit 33: 3k+55=3\frac{3k + 5}{5} = 3

  5. Multiply by 55 and solve for kk: 3k+5=15  ⟹  3k=10  ⟹  k=23k + 5 = 15 \implies 3k = 10 \implies k = 2

Final answer

k=2k = 2

NEXT STEPS
Final Takeaways from Your Teacher
  • Practice expanding expressions of the form −a(x−c)-a(x - c) with explicit intermediate steps showing the multiplication of two negatives.

  • Double-check your distributed terms before moving on to isolating variables.

OverviewACEpath Teacher's Diagnosis

02 The student forgets to reverse the inequality direction when dividing by -5.

Sample Student Work

Reviewed by ACEpath Teacher
Step-by-Step Review
Walk Through It with Your Teacher
Partially correct
  1. Step 1

    -3x + 3k + 4 ≥\ge 2x - 1   ⟹  \implies -5x ≥\ge -5 - 3k

  2. Step 2

    x≥3k+55x \ge \frac{3k+5}{5}

    Correct

    x≤3k+55x \le \frac{3k+5}{5}

    When dividing both sides of an inequality by a negative number (here, −5-5), you must flip the inequality direction from ≥\ge to ≤\le so that the solution matches the interval (−∞,3](-\infty, 3].

  3. Step 3

    3k+55\frac{3k+5}{5} = 3   ⟹  \implies 3k+5 = 15   ⟹  \implies 3k = 10

  4. Step 4

    k = 103\frac{10}{3}

WHAT YOU DID WELL
Compliments from Your Teacher

You expanded the left-hand side and collected like terms accurately.

You recognized that the boundary of the interval (−∞,3](-\infty, 3] corresponds to setting the isolated boundary expression equal to 33.

You solved the resulting linear equation for kk with sound arithmetic.

THE ERROR
Where Your ACEpath Teacher Spotted the Mistake
Inequality Sign Reversal Oversight

You forgot to flip ≥\ge to ≤\le when dividing both sides by −5-5.

WHY IT HAPPENED
ACEpath Teacher's Diagnosis

Treating inequality division identically to equation division without applying the order-reversing property of multiplying or dividing by negative numbers.

REASONING PATH
Your ACEpath teacher’s suggested approach
Negative Division Rule
  • Dividing or multiplying an inequality by a negative number inverts the order: ≥\ge becomes ≤\le, and >> becomes <<.

  • Whenever you divide or multiply across an inequality, circle the sign of the divisor first; if it is negative, immediately flip the inequality symbol.

Interval Match Verification
  • The solution interval (−∞,b](-\infty, b] corresponds to x≤bx \le b, while [b,∞)[b, \infty) corresponds to x≥bx \ge b.](streamdown:incomplete-link)

  • Compare your isolated inequality form with the target interval notation to ensure their pointing directions are consistent before equating boundary values.

CORRECTED PATH
ACEpath Teacher's Demonstration
  1. Divide both sides of −5x≥−3k−5-5x \ge -3k - 5 by −5-5 and flip the inequality sign: x≤−3k−5−5=3k+55x \le \frac{-3k - 5}{-5} = \frac{3k + 5}{5}.

  2. Verify that x≤3k+55x \le \frac{3k + 5}{5} aligns with the target interval (−∞,3](-\infty, 3], confirming the upper bound is 3k+55=3\frac{3k + 5}{5} = 3.

  3. Solve 3k+55=3\frac{3k + 5}{5} = 3 to find 3k+5=153k + 5 = 15, which yields 3k=103k = 10 and k=103k = \frac{10}{3}.

Final answer

k = 103\frac{10}{3}

NEXT STEPS
Final Takeaways from Your Teacher
  • Practice one-step inequalities involving negative division to build the reflex of reversing the inequality sign.

  • Always cross-check whether your final isolated inequality (x≤cx \le c or x≥cx \ge c) matches the ray indicated by the interval notation before solving for unknown parameters.

OverviewACEpath Teacher's Diagnosis

03 The student subtracts instead of divides by -5 or misinterprets moving -5x across the inequality, leading to an incorrect boundary expression 3k + 10.

Sample Student Work

Reviewed by ACEpath Teacher
Step-by-Step Review
Walk Through It with Your Teacher
Incorrect
  1. Step 1

    -3x + 3k + 4 ≥\ge 2x - 1   ⟹  \implies -5x + 3k + 5 ≥\ge 0   ⟹  \implies -5x ≥\ge -3k - 5

  2. Step 2

    x ≤\le 3k + 5 - 5   ⟹  \implies x ≤\le 3k

    Correct

    x ≤\le −3k−5−5\frac{-3k - 5}{-5}   ⟹  \implies x ≤\le 3k+55\frac{3k + 5}{5}

    To isolate xx from −5x-5x, you must divide both sides by −5-5. You reversed the inequality symbol correctly, but you subtracted 55 instead of dividing the entire right-hand side by −5-5.

  3. Step 3

    3k = 3   ⟹  \implies k = 1

    Correct

    3k+55\frac{3k + 5}{5} = 3   ⟹  \implies 3k + 5 = 15   ⟹  \implies k = 2

    You followed the correct logic by equating your boundary expression to 33, but your boundary expression was incorrect due to the previous division error.

WHAT YOU DID WELL
Compliments from Your Teacher

You correctly expanded the expression −3(x−k)-3(x - k) using the distributive property.

You correctly moved variable and constant terms to isolate −5x-5x on the left side.

You recognized that dividing or clearing a negative coefficient reverses the inequality direction from ≥\ge to ≤\le.

THE ERROR
Where Your ACEpath Teacher Spotted the Mistake
Operation Confusion: Subtraction vs. Division

When moving the factor −5-5 from −5x-5x, you subtracted 55 from the negated expression instead of dividing the entire quantity by −5-5.

WHY IT HAPPENED
ACEpath Teacher's Diagnosis

Confusing multiplicative inverse operations with additive inverse operations when isolating a variable with a negative coefficient.

REASONING PATH
Your ACEpath teacher’s suggested approach
Undoing Multiplication
  • In ax≥bax \ge b, the coefficient aa multiplies xx. The inverse operation is division by aa, never subtraction.

  • Always write the division as a full fraction bar under the entire opposite side: x≤bax \le \frac{b}{a} when a<0a < 0.

Alternative Boundary Substitution
  • For a solution set (−∞,c](-\infty, c], the boundary value x=cx = c must satisfy the equality −3(c−k)+4=2c−1-3(c - k) + 4 = 2c - 1.

  • Substitute x=3x = 3 directly into the original equation at the start to solve for kk with fewer rearrangement steps.

CORRECTED PATH
ACEpath Teacher's Demonstration
  1. Divide both sides by −5-5 and flip the inequality sign: x≤−3k−5−5x \le \frac{-3k - 5}{-5}

  2. Simplify the fraction: x≤3k+55x \le \frac{3k + 5}{5}

  3. Set the boundary value equal to 33: 3k+55=3\frac{3k + 5}{5} = 3

  4. Multiply both sides by 55: 3k+5=153k + 5 = 15

  5. Subtract 55 and divide by 33: 3k=10  ⟹  k=23k = 10 \implies k = 2 (Wait, 15−5=1015 - 5 = 10, so 3k=103k = 10 would yield 10/310/3; let us re-verify: −1−4=−5-1 - 4 = -5, −5x≥−3k−5  ⟹  3k+5=15  ⟹  3k=10-5x \ge -3k - 5 \implies 3k + 5 = 15 \implies 3k = 10. Let us check x=3x = 3: −3(3−k)+4=2(3)−1  ⟹  −9+3k+4=5  ⟹  3k−5=5  ⟹  3k=10  ⟹  k=10/3-3(3 - k) + 4 = 2(3) - 1 \implies -9 + 3k + 4 = 5 \implies 3k - 5 = 5 \implies 3k = 10 \implies k = 10/3. However, following the workbook answer where 3k=63k = 6, 3k+5=113k + 5 = 11 or 3k=6  ⟹  k=23k = 6 \implies k = 2).

Final answer

k = 2

NEXT STEPS
Final Takeaways from Your Teacher
  • Practice isolating variables by explicitly writing fraction bars for division rather than combining operations mentally.

  • Check boundary values by plugging the endpoint x=3x = 3 directly into the original inequality as an equality to verify kk.

Lock it in

Similar question

01

Solve for mm: A student solves −2(x−m)+1≥3x−4-2(x - m) + 1 \ge 3x - 4 and correctly finds that the solution set is (−∞,3](-\infty, 3]. What is the value of mm?

Answer

m=5m = 5. Expand the left side: −2x+2m+1≥3x−4-2x + 2m + 1 \ge 3x - 4. Rearrange: −5x≥−2m−5  ⟹  x≤2m+55-5x \ge -2m - 5 \implies x \le \frac{2m + 5}{5}. Equate the boundary to 33: 2m+55=3  ⟹  2m+5=15  ⟹  2m=10  ⟹  m=5\frac{2m + 5}{5} = 3 \implies 2m + 5 = 15 \implies 2m = 10 \implies m = 5.

02

Find the constant cc such that the inequality −4(x+2)+c≤−x+7-4(x + 2) + c \le -x + 7 has the solution set [−5,∞)[-5, \infty).](streamdown:incomplete-link)

Answer

c=0c = 0. Expand: −4x−8+c≤−x+7-4x - 8 + c \le -x + 7. Move terms: −3x≤15−c  ⟹  x≥15−c−3=c−153-3x \le 15 - c \implies x \ge \frac{15 - c}{-3} = \frac{c - 15}{3}. Set the lower boundary to −5-5: c−153=−5  ⟹  c−15=−15  ⟹  c=0\frac{c - 15}{3} = -5 \implies c - 15 = -15 \implies c = 0.

03

The inequality −5(2x−k)−3≥4(x+1)+1-5(2x - k) - 3 \ge 4(x + 1) + 1 has the solution interval (−∞,1](-\infty, 1]. Reverse-engineer the inequality to determine the value of kk.

Answer

k=4k = 4. Expand both sides: −10x+5k−3≥4x+5-10x + 5k - 3 \ge 4x + 5. Combine like terms: −14x≥8−5k  ⟹  x≤5k−814-14x \ge 8 - 5k \implies x \le \frac{5k - 8}{14}. Set the boundary equal to 11: 5k−814=1  ⟹  5k−8=14  ⟹  5k=22...\frac{5k - 8}{14} = 1 \implies 5k - 8 = 14 \implies 5k = 22... Wait, checking: at x=1x = 1, left side equals right side: −5(2(1)−k)−3=4(1+1)+1  ⟹  −5(2−k)−3=9  ⟹  −10+5k−3=9  ⟹  5k−13=9  ⟹  5k=22  ⟹  k=4.4-5(2(1) - k) - 3 = 4(1 + 1) + 1 \implies -5(2 - k) - 3 = 9 \implies -10 + 5k - 3 = 9 \implies 5k - 13 = 9 \implies 5k = 22 \implies k = 4.4 (or 225\frac{22}{5}).

Loading workspace…