Resources

A student attempts to solve the equation 4x−8x−2=3x−2\frac{4x - 8}{x - 2} = 3x - 2 by first dividing both sides by (x−2)(x - 2) after factoring the numerator as 4(x−2)4(x - 2), concluding that x=2x = 2 is a valid solution. Rigorously analyze the equation over the real domain: isolate the variable on both sides, state whether x=2x = 2 is an extraneous root or a valid solution, and determine the complete, true solution set.

Answer and steps

Final answer

No real solution (the prospective solution x=2x = 2 is extraneous due to division by zero in the original equation's domain restriction x≠2x \neq 2, resulting in the empty set ∅\emptyset).

Steps

01

Identify the Domain of the Equation

Before performing any algebraic operations on a rational equation, determine any values of the variable that make a denominator equal to zero.

The given equation is: 4x−8x−2=3x−2\frac{4x - 8}{x - 2} = 3x - 2

The denominator on the left-hand side is x−2x - 2. Setting the denominator to zero gives: x−2=0  ⟹  x=2x - 2 = 0 \implies x = 2

Because division by zero is undefined, the domain of the equation is restricted to all real numbers except 22: x≠2x \neq 2


02

Simplify the Equation Under the Domain Restriction

Assuming x≠2x \neq 2, the term (x−2)(x - 2) is non-zero, allowing us to factor the numerator and cancel the common factor: 4(x−2)x−2=3x−2\frac{4(x - 2)}{x - 2} = 3x - 2

Canceling (x−2)(x - 2) yields: 4=3x−24 = 3x - 2


03

Solve the Linear Equation

Isolate the variable term 3x3x by adding 22 to both sides: 4+2=3x4 + 2 = 3x 6=3x6 = 3x

Divide both sides by 33: x=2x = 2


04

Check for Extraneous Solutions

Compare the candidate solution x=2x = 2 with the domain restriction established in Step 1:

  • The algebraic simplification yielded x=2x = 2.
  • However, the original equation requires x≠2x \neq 2.

Substituting x=2x = 2 into the original expression results in: 4(2)−82−2=00\frac{4(2) - 8}{2 - 2} = \frac{0}{0} which is undefined.

Therefore, x=2x = 2 is an extraneous root created by removing the denominator during simplification.

Conclusion

Since the only algebraic candidate is extraneous, the original equation has no real solution, and the complete solution set is the empty set: ∅\emptyset

Educational illustration for this question

Typical errors

OverviewACEpath Teacher's Diagnosis

01 The student ignores the restriction that the denominator cannot be zero, accepting the algebraic result x = 2 as a valid solution.

Sample Student Work

Reviewed by ACEpath Teacher
Step-by-Step Review
Walk Through It with Your Teacher
Incorrect
  1. Step 1

    4(x−2)x−2\frac{4(x-2)}{x-2} = 3x - 2   ⟹  \implies 4 = 3x - 2

  2. Step 2

    3x = 6   ⟹  \implies x = 2

  3. Step 3

    x = 2  is a valid solution because substituting gives \text{ is a valid solution because substituting gives } 4 = 4.

    Correct

    Substitute \text{Substitute } x = 2  into the original denominator: \text{ into the original denominator: } 2 - 2 = 0   ⟹  \implies undefined. Thus, \text{undefined. Thus, } x = 2  is an extraneous solution.\text{ is an extraneous solution.}

    You substituted x=2x = 2 into the simplified expression 4=3x−24 = 3x - 2 instead of the original equation. In the original equation, substituting x=2x = 2 produces 00\frac{0}{0}, which is undefined.

  4. Step 4

    Solution set: {2}\text{Solution set: } \lbrace 2 \rbrace

    Correct

    Solution set: ∅ (or no real solution)\text{Solution set: } \emptyset \text{ (or no real solution)}

    Because your verification concluded that x=2x = 2 was valid, your final solution set included an extraneous root instead of being the empty set.

WHAT YOU DID WELL
Compliments from Your Teacher

You correctly factored 4(x−2)4(x - 2) from the numerator.

You canceled the common factor to produce the correct linear equation 4=3x−24 = 3x - 2.

You solved the linear equation 3x=63x = 6 accurately to obtain x=2x = 2.

THE ERROR
Where Your ACEpath Teacher Spotted the Mistake
Extraneous solution from division by zero

no

WHY IT HAPPENED
ACEpath Teacher's Diagnosis

You validated the candidate root against the simplified linear equation instead of testing it against the original rational equation and its non-zero denominator condition (x≠2x \neq 2).

REASONING PATH
Your ACEpath teacher’s suggested approach
State Denominator Restrictions First
  • Any variable expression in a denominator must never equal zero: denominator≠0\text{denominator} \neq 0.

  • Before simplifying or canceling any factors, write down all excluded values by setting each denominator equal to 00.

Always Check Against the Original Equation
  • Candidate roots must satisfy the original, unsimplified equation, not an algebraically modified version.

  • Substitute the candidate value directly into the initial expression to confirm it does not cause division by zero.

CORRECTED PATH
ACEpath Teacher's Demonstration
  1. Check the original denominator with the candidate root: when x=2x = 2, the denominator is x−2=2−2=0x - 2 = 2 - 2 = 0.

  2. Recognize that division by zero is undefined, which makes x=2x = 2 an extraneous root.

  3. Since x=2x = 2 is the only algebraic candidate and it is extraneous, discard it.

Final answer

No real solution (Solution set: ∅\emptyset)

NEXT STEPS
Final Takeaways from Your Teacher
  • Always write down domain exclusions (such as x−2≠0  ⟹  x≠2x - 2 \neq 0 \implies x \neq 2) at the very first step before canceling common algebraic factors.

  • Whenever you test candidate solutions, plug them back into the original equation rather than any simplified intermediate step.

OverviewACEpath Teacher's Diagnosis

02 The student multiplies both sides by (x - 2) and factors the resulting quadratic into two roots, failing to reject x = 2 as extraneous.

Sample Student Work

Reviewed by ACEpath Teacher
Step-by-Step Review
Walk Through It with Your Teacher
Incorrect
  1. Step 1

    4x - 8 = (3x - 2)(x - 2)   ⟹  \implies 4x - 8 = 3x^2 - 8x + 4

  2. Step 2

    3x^2 - 12x + 12 = 0   ⟹  \implies 3(x - 2)^2 = 0   ⟹  \implies x = 2

  3. Step 3

    x = 2  is a valid solution since it satisfies the expanded quadratic equation.\text{ is a valid solution since it satisfies the expanded quadratic equation.}

    Correct

    x = 2  makes the original denominator \text{ makes the original denominator } x - 2 = 0,  so it is an extraneous root.\text{ so it is an extraneous root.}

    Candidate solutions must satisfy the original equation, not merely an equation derived after clearing denominators. At x=2x = 2, the denominator x−2x - 2 equals 00, making the original expression undefined.

  4. Step 4

    Solution set: {2}\text{Solution set: } \{2\}

    Correct

    Solution set: ∅\text{Solution set: } \emptyset

    Because the only candidate root x=2x = 2 is extraneous, the original equation has no real solution.

WHAT YOU DID WELL
Compliments from Your Teacher

You expanded the product (3x−2)(x−2)(3x - 2)(x - 2) into 3x2−8x+43x^2 - 8x + 4 without algebraic errors.

You collected like terms correctly to form 3x2−12x+12=03x^2 - 12x + 12 = 0.

You recognized and factored the perfect square trinomial to isolate x=2x = 2.

THE ERROR
Where Your ACEpath Teacher Spotted the Mistake
Extraneous Solution Ignored

Testing the candidate root x=2x = 2 in the derived quadratic equation instead of verifying it against the original denominator.

WHY IT HAPPENED
ACEpath Teacher's Diagnosis

Treating an equation obtained after multiplying by a variable factor as strictly equivalent to the original rational equation without enforcing the domain restriction x≠2x \neq 2.

REASONING PATH
Your ACEpath teacher’s suggested approach
Establish the domain first
  • Before multiplying through by any denominator containing a variable, set each denominator ≠0\neq 0.

  • Write x−2≠0  ⟹  x≠2x - 2 \neq 0 \implies x \neq 2 at the very top of your solution.

Always check prospective roots in the original equation
  • Multiplying by an expression that can equal zero may introduce extraneous solutions.

  • Substitute any algebraic candidate back into the original denominators before declaring the final solution set.

CORRECTED PATH
ACEpath Teacher's Demonstration
  1. State the domain restriction from the original equation: x−2≠0  ⟹  x≠2x - 2 \neq 0 \implies x \neq 2.

  2. Evaluate the candidate x=2x = 2: substituting x=2x = 2 gives 4(2)−82−2=00\frac{4(2) - 8}{2 - 2} = \frac{0}{0}, which is undefined.

  3. Conclude that x=2x = 2 is extraneous, leaving no valid real solutions.

Final answer

No real solution (the prospective solution x=2x = 2 is extraneous, so the solution set is ∅\emptyset).

NEXT STEPS
Final Takeaways from Your Teacher
  • Record the non-permissible values of the variable as the very first step in rational equations.

  • Never verify solutions using a downstream derived equation; always substitute back into the original formulation.

Lock it in

Similar question

01

Solve the rational equation over the real numbers: 5x−15x−3=2x−1\frac{5x - 15}{x - 3} = 2x - 1. State whether any candidate root is extraneous and give the complete solution set.

Answer

x=3x = 3 is an extraneous root; solution set: ∅\emptyset. Key steps: Factoring gives 5(x−3)x−3=2x−1\frac{5(x-3)}{x-3} = 2x - 1. For x≠3x \neq 3, simplify to 5=2x−1  ⟹  2x=6  ⟹  x=35 = 2x - 1 \implies 2x = 6 \implies x = 3. Because x=3x = 3 makes the original denominator 3−3=03 - 3 = 0, it must be rejected.

02

Solve the equation over the real numbers: x2−4x−2=5\frac{x^2 - 4}{x - 2} = 5. Determine if there are any extraneous roots and state the final solution set.

Answer

x=3x = 3 is a valid solution; solution set: {3}\lbrace 3 \rbrace. Key steps: Domain restriction is x≠2x \neq 2. Factoring the numerator gives (x−2)(x+2)x−2=5  ⟹  x+2=5  ⟹  x=3\frac{(x-2)(x+2)}{x-2} = 5 \implies x + 2 = 5 \implies x = 3. Since 3≠23 \neq 2, the root is valid.

03

Solve the rational equation over the real numbers: 2x2−8xx−4=x+4\frac{2x^2 - 8x}{x - 4} = x + 4. Identify all extraneous and valid roots, and write the complete solution set.

Answer

x=4x = 4 is an extraneous root; solution set: ∅\emptyset. Key steps: Domain restriction is x≠4x \neq 4. Factoring gives 2x(x−4)x−4=x+4\frac{2x(x-4)}{x-4} = x + 4. For x≠4x \neq 4, cancel to get 2x=x+4  ⟹  x=42x = x + 4 \implies x = 4. Since x=4x = 4 causes division by zero in the original equation, it is extraneous, leaving no real solution.

Loading workspace…