Resources
Evaluate whether like terms can be combined across transcendental bases by fully simplifying: . Express your final answer in the form , where and are integers.
Answer and steps
Final answer
Steps
Rewrite terms using exponent rules
To simplify the expression, we use exponent rules to isolate the common exponential factors and , and then combine like terms.
Recall the product rule for exponents: .
Apply this rule to expand terms with shifted exponents:
- For the terms involving base :
- For the terms involving base :
Group and combine like terms for each base
Substitute the rewritten terms back into the original expression:
Factor out and from their respective groups:
Calculate the integer coefficients:
This yields:
Check whether terms across different bases can be combined
Terms with different bases, such as and , are not like terms because their variable components grow at different exponential rates and are linearly independent functions. Therefore, they cannot be merged into a single term.
The fully simplified expression in the form is:
Typical errors
01 The student incorrectly adds bases across different exponential bases, combining 21 · 2^x and 2 · 3^x into 23 · 5^x.
Sample Student Work
Reviewed by ACEpath TeacherStep-by-Step Review
Walk Through It with Your Teacher- Step 1
= 7 2 2^x - 5 2^x + 3 4 2^x - 4 3^x + 2 3 3^x = 14 2^x - 5 2^x + 12 2^x - 4 3^x + 6 3^x
- Step 2
= 21 2^x + 2 3^x
- Step 3
= 23 5^x
Correct21 2^x + 2 3^x
You attempted to add the coefficients () and add the bases (). Terms with different bases, such as and , are not like terms and cannot be merged into a single power.
WHAT YOU DID WELL
Compliments from Your TeacherYou correctly used exponent rules to break down , , and .
You correctly simplified and collected like terms sharing the same base to obtain .
THE ERROR
Where Your ACEpath Teacher Spotted the Mistakeno
WHY IT HAPPENED
ACEpath Teacher's DiagnosisYou treated terms with different exponential bases ( and ) as combinable like terms by simultaneously adding their coefficients and their bases.
REASONING PATH
Your ACEpath teacher’s suggested approach- Check for like terms in exponential expressions
Two exponential terms and are like terms if and only if they share both the exact same base () and exponent. If , they cannot be combined into a single base term.
Leave terms with different bases separate: is already in simplest form.
- Respect the requested form
When a problem specifies the target form , the final answer must retain both bases and .
Stop simplifying once the expression matches the required template .
CORRECTED PATH
ACEpath Teacher's DemonstrationRecognize that and involve linearly independent functions with different bases ().
Verify that the expression is already in the requested form , where and .
21 2^x + 2 3^x
02 The student misapplies the exponent rule by adding the shift to the coefficient instead of multiplying by the base raised to the power, treating 2^(x+1) as 2^x + 1.
Sample Student Work
Reviewed by ACEpath TeacherStep-by-Step Review
Walk Through It with Your Teacher- Step 1
7 2^x + 14 - 5 2^x + 3 2^x + 12 - 4 3^x + 2 3^x + 6
Correct14 2^x - 5 2^x + 12 2^x - 4 3^x + 6 3^x
You expanded as , as , and as . By the product rule of exponents, adding terms in an exponent corresponds to multiplication of powers: . Therefore, , , and .
- Step 2
5 2^x - 2 3^x + 32
Correct21 2^x + 2 3^x
Your arithmetic , , and ) correctly combined the terms from your previous line, but the result is affected by the incorrect expansion in Step 1.
WHAT YOU DID WELL
Compliments from Your TeacherYou recognized that terms with different exponential bases like and cannot be merged together.
You accurately collected like terms and calculated integer coefficients based on your intermediate expression.
THE ERROR
Where Your ACEpath Teacher Spotted the MistakeYou split into instead of multiplying factors as .
WHY IT HAPPENED
ACEpath Teacher's DiagnosisYou applied a distributive/additive model to exponents by treating addition in the exponent as polynomial addition outside the base (). Because exponentiation distributes over multiplication rather than addition, an addition in the exponent always translates into multiplying by the base raised to that power.
REASONING PATH
Your ACEpath teacher’s suggested approach- Exponent Product Law
For any positive base and real exponents, , never .
Whenever you see a sum in an exponent, immediately factor it out as a product before distributing any outer coefficient.
- Scaling Coefficients
.
Calculate the constant multiplier first, keeping as the sole variable factor.
CORRECTED PATH
ACEpath Teacher's DemonstrationRewrite each shifted exponential term using :
Group like terms for each base:
Simplify the integer coefficients: and .
21 2^x + 2 3^x
03 The student evaluates 2^(x+2) as 2 · 2^x rather than 4 · 2^x, confusing 2^2 with 2.
Sample Student Work
Reviewed by ACEpath TeacherStep-by-Step Review
Walk Through It with Your Teacher- Step 1
14 2^x - 5 2^x + 3 2 2^x - 4 3^x + 6 3^x 14 2^x - 5 2^x + 6 2^x - 4 3^x + 6 3^x
Correct14 2^x - 5 2^x + 3 4 2^x - 4 3^x + 6 3^x 14 2^x - 5 2^x + 12 2^x - 4 3^x + 6 3^x
You expanded and accurately. However, when splitting , the exponent rule gives , not .
- Step 2
15 2^x + 2 3^x
Correct21 2^x + 2 3^x
Your arithmetic and followed logically from your prior line, but the result for the term is affected by the earlier exponent slip.
WHAT YOU DID WELL
Compliments from Your TeacherYou correctly recognized that terms with like exponential factors ( and ) should be grouped separately.
You accurately applied the product rule of exponents to and .
THE ERROR
Where Your ACEpath Teacher Spotted the MistakeYou wrote as , forgetting to evaluate the power .
WHY IT HAPPENED
ACEpath Teacher's DiagnosisConfusing the constant shift in the exponent with a constant multiplier, or writing the base without squaring it when splitting .
REASONING PATH
Your ACEpath teacher’s suggested approach- Exponent Separation Rule
Always compute the numerical constant before multiplying it by the outside coefficient.
- Evaluate Powers First
, ,
Check that the separated numerical factor reflects the base raised to the exponent shift, not just the shift itself.
CORRECTED PATH
ACEpath Teacher's DemonstrationRewrite as .
Combine the coefficients for base : .
Combine the coefficients for base : .
21 2^x + 2 3^x
Lock it in
Can you combine into a single exponential term?
No. Terms with different exponential bases are not like terms, so their coefficients and bases cannot be added together.
Similar question
Fully simplify the expression by combining like terms: . Express your answer in the form .
Answer
Rewrite shifted terms: and . Group like terms: .
Simplify the expression: . Express your result using the single base and base .
Answer
Notice that . Then rewrite: .
Determine all values of the constant such that the expression simplifies to .
Answer
Simplify base 2 terms: , which matches. Simplify base 5 terms: . Setting gives .