Resources
A student attempts to solve the equation by factoring the numerator as , canceling the factor to obtain , and concluding that is the unique solution. Determine the true number of solutions to the original equation and identify why the student's conclusion fails.
Answer and steps
Final answer
No solution. (The expression is undefined at due to division by zero; the domain is . Since the only candidate root is , the solution set is empty .)
Steps
Identify the domain restriction of the equation
Before simplifying any rational expression, check for values of the variable that make any denominator equal to zero, because division by zero is mathematically undefined.
In the equation:
The denominator is . Setting it to zero gives:
Therefore, the equation is only defined for . The domain is all real numbers except :
Solve the simplified equation
Under the condition that , the term is non-zero, which makes dividing both the numerator and the denominator by valid:
Subtract from both sides:
This yields as the only candidate root.
Compare the candidate solution with the domain
Now verify whether the candidate root satisfies the original equation:
- The candidate solution is .
- However, substituting into the original expression gives: which is undefined.
Thus, is an extraneous solution introduced by canceling a factor that equals zero.
Conclusion
- True number of solutions: No solution (the solution set is empty, ).
- Why the student's conclusion fails: The student canceled the common factor without accounting for the domain restriction . Canceling a factor of zero is invalid, making the resulting value an extraneous root rather than a valid solution.
Typical errors
01 The student concludes there is one solution by accepting x = 4 after only checking that it satisfies the simplified equation x + 4 = 8 rather than the original equation.
Sample Student Work
Reviewed by ACEpath TeacherStep-by-Step Review
Walk Through It with Your Teacher- Step 1
There is 1 solution.
CorrectThere are no solutions ( solutions).
The original equation is undefined at due to division by zero. Since is the only candidate root, the solution set is empty.
- Step 2
The student's conclusion does not fail because substituting 4 gives 4 + 4 = 8, which is true.
CorrectThe student's conclusion fails because canceling the factor is only valid when (). Substituting into the original equation produces the undefined expression .
Checking the simplified equation is not sufficient because canceling assumes . Substituting into the original denominator results in division by zero, making an extraneous root.
WHAT YOU DID WELL
Compliments from Your TeacherYou correctly verified that satisfies the simplified equation .
THE ERROR
Where Your ACEpath Teacher Spotted the MistakeTesting the candidate root in the simplified equation rather than checking the domain of the original rational expression.
WHY IT HAPPENED
ACEpath Teacher's DiagnosisYou treated algebraic cancellation as an unconditional equivalence, overlooking that dividing numerator and denominator by is valid only when . Consequently, substituting the candidate into the simplified form fails to detect that it causes division by zero in the original expression.
REASONING PATH
Your ACEpath teacher’s suggested approach- Establish the Domain First
For any rational expression , division by zero is undefined, so .
Set every denominator equal to at the start and list all excluded values before factoring or canceling.
- Always Test the Original Equation
Candidate roots must satisfy the original equation, not just an intermediate or simplified version.
Substitute any candidate root back into the original unsimplified denominator to confirm it does not produce division by zero.
CORRECTED PATH
ACEpath Teacher's DemonstrationSet the denominator to zero: . Therefore, the domain restriction is .
For , cancel the common non-zero factor: .
Compare the candidate root with the domain restriction . Since is excluded, it is an extraneous solution.
The equation has no solution ( solutions). The student's conclusion fails because substituting into the original expression causes division by zero (), making an extraneous root.
02 The student confuses an undefined expression with having infinitely many solutions by interpreting 0/0 as an identity.
Sample Student Work
Reviewed by ACEpath TeacherStep-by-Step Review
Walk Through It with Your Teacher- Step 1
At the equation gives
- Step 2
which means any value works rather than having a unique solution
CorrectDivision by zero is undefined, so is excluded from the domain ()
The form does not mean every real number satisfies the equation. Division by zero is undefined in real arithmetic, which makes an extraneous candidate rather than an identity.
- Step 3
There are infinitely many solutions.
CorrectThere is no solution (the solution set is empty, )
Since the only candidate root is excluded by the domain restriction , no value satisfies the original equation.
WHAT YOU DID WELL
Compliments from Your TeacherYou checked the candidate root in the original equation.
You recognized that substituting yields .
THE ERROR
Where Your ACEpath Teacher Spotted the MistakeInterpreting an undefined division-by-zero expression as an identity that allows infinitely many solutions.
WHY IT HAPPENED
ACEpath Teacher's DiagnosisYou confused the undefined result of dividing by zero (which excludes the input from the equation's domain) with an algebraic identity like (which is satisfied by all real numbers).
REASONING PATH
Your ACEpath teacher’s suggested approach- Denominator Zero Rule
Any value of that makes a denominator zero cannot be part of the domain, because division by zero is undefined.
Always establish domain restrictions before simplifying by setting each denominator .
- Extraneous Solution Check
If simplifying an equation produces a root that violates the original domain restriction, that root is extraneous and must be discarded.
Compare every candidate solution against the domain before finalizing the count of solutions.
CORRECTED PATH
ACEpath Teacher's DemonstrationState the domain of the equation by requiring , which gives .
For , simplify to obtain , which yields the candidate .
Compare the candidate root with the domain restriction : since is excluded, is an extraneous root.
No solution
Lock it in
When can you legally cancel a factor from both the numerator and denominator of an algebraic fraction?
Only when . Canceling is dividing by that factor, which is invalid if the factor equals zero.
Similar question
Determine the number of solutions to the equation .
Answer
No solution ( solutions). Domain restriction: . Factoring gives . Because is excluded by the domain, it is an extraneous root.
Find all real solutions to .
Answer
No solution. The denominator requires . Factoring gives for . Since , is a valid solution. The solution set is .
Determine all real solutions to the equation .
Answer
. Denominator restrictions: . Numerator factors as , giving candidate roots and . Since is excluded by the denominator restriction, it is extraneous. Thus, the only valid solution is .