Resources

Solve the compound inequality −13≤3−4x<11-13 \le 3 - 4x < 11 for real numbers xx. State the solution set in interval notation, and identify the smallest integer xx that satisfies the inequality.

Answer and steps

Final answer

Interval: (−2,4](-2, 4]; Smallest integer: −1-1

Steps

To solve the compound inequality −13≤3−4x<11-13 \le 3 - 4x < 11, isolate the variable xx in the middle by applying standard inequality properties to all three parts simultaneously.

Step 1: Subtract 33 from all three parts

−13−3≤−4x<11−3-13 - 3 \le -4x < 11 - 3−16≤−4x<8-16 \le -4x < 8

Step 2: Divide all parts by −4-4

Key Rule and Common Pitfall: When dividing or multiplying an inequality by a negative number, you must reverse the inequality signs (≤\le becomes ≥\ge, and << becomes >>).

−16−4≥x>8−4\frac{-16}{-4} \ge x > \frac{8}{-4}4≥x>−24 \ge x > -2

Rewriting this in standard order from least to greatest:

−2<x≤4-2 < x \le 4

Step 3: Express the solution in interval notation

Since xx is strictly greater than −2-2 (not including −2-2) and less than or equal to 44 (including 44), the solution set is:

(−2,4](-2, 4]

Step 4: Identify the smallest integer satisfying the inequality

The integers belonging to the interval (−2,4](-2, 4] are:

{−1,0,1,2,3,4}\{-1, 0, 1, 2, 3, 4\}

Because −2-2 is excluded by the open boundary, the smallest integer value for xx is:

−1-1
Educational illustration for this question

Typical errors

OverviewACEpath Teacher's Diagnosis

01 The student forgets to reverse the inequality signs when dividing by a negative number, resulting in an reversed or inconsistent interval and selecting the wrong minimum integer.

Sample Student Work

Reviewed by ACEpath Teacher
Step-by-Step Review
Walk Through It with Your Teacher
Incorrect
  1. Step 1

    -13 ≤\le 3 - 4x < 11   ⟹  \implies -16 ≤\le -4x < 8

  2. Step 2

    4 ≤\le x < -2

    Correct

    4 ≥\ge x > -2   (or \text{or } -2 < x ≤\le 4)

    When dividing or multiplying an inequality by a negative number (here, −4-4), both inequality signs must flip directions: ≤\le becomes ≥\ge, and << becomes >>.

  3. Step 3

    Solution set: [4,−2)\text{Solution set: } [4, -2)](streamdown:incomplete-link)

    Correct

    (-2, 4]

    This interval notation directly followed your unflipped inequality. Intervals must always be written with the smaller number on the left and the larger number on the right.

  4. Step 4

    Smallest integer is 4\text{Smallest integer is } 4

    Correct

    -1

    Because the interval was reversed, you selected 4 instead of looking for the smallest integer strictly greater than −2-2, which is −1-1.

WHAT YOU DID WELL
Compliments from Your Teacher

You correctly isolated the variable term −4x-4x in the middle by subtracting 3 from all three parts.

THE ERROR
Where Your ACEpath Teacher Spotted the Mistake
Sign reversal omission upon negative division

none

WHY IT HAPPENED
ACEpath Teacher's Diagnosis

You forgot the fundamental rule of inequalities: dividing or multiplying by a negative number reverses the order of the inequality signs.

REASONING PATH
Your ACEpath teacher’s suggested approach
Negative Multiplication / Division Rule
  • If a<ba < b and c<0c < 0, then ac>bc\frac{a}{c} > \frac{b}{c}.

  • Whenever you divide or multiply an inequality across by a negative coefficient, flip every inequality symbol immediately.

Sanity Check for Interval Order
  • Every real interval [a,b][a, b] or (a,b)(a, b) must satisfy a<ba < b.

  • If your resulting boundaries appear as [4,−2)[4, -2), stop and check whether an inequality direction was missed, then rearrange the inequality from least to greatest.](streamdown:incomplete-link)

CORRECTED PATH
ACEpath Teacher's Demonstration
  1. Divide each part of −16≤−4x<8-16 \le -4x < 8 by −4-4 and flip both inequality symbols: −16−4≥−4x−4>8−4\frac{-16}{-4} \ge \frac{-4x}{-4} > \frac{8}{-4}, which simplifies to 4≥x>−24 \ge x > -2.

  2. Rewrite the inequality from least to greatest: −2<x≤4-2 < x \le 4.

  3. Write the solution set in interval notation: (−2,4](-2, 4].

  4. List the integers inside (−2,4](-2, 4]: {−1,0,1,2,3,4}\{-1, 0, 1, 2, 3, 4\}. The smallest integer is −1-1.

Final answer

Interval: (−2,4](-2, 4]; Smallest integer: −1-1

NEXT STEPS
Final Takeaways from Your Teacher
  • Practice single-step and compound inequalities with negative coefficients to make flipping the sign an automatic habit.

  • Always write interval notation strictly in increasing order (a,b](a, b] where a<ba < b, which instantly alerts you if an inequality was solved backwards.

OverviewACEpath Teacher's Diagnosis

02 The student confuses strict and non-strict inequality endpoints, treating the open boundary at -2 as inclusive and wrongly concluding that -2 is the smallest integer solution.

Sample Student Work

Reviewed by ACEpath Teacher
Step-by-Step Review
Walk Through It with Your Teacher
Partially correct
  1. Step 1

    -13 ≤\le 3 - 4x < 11   ⟹  \implies -16 ≤\le -4x < 8   ⟹  \implies 4 ≥\ge x > -2   ⟹  \implies -2 < x ≤\le 4

  2. Step 2

    Solution set: [−2,4]\text{Solution set: } [-2, 4]

    Correct

    (-2, 4]

    The inequality at the lower bound is strict (−2<x-2 < x), which requires an open parenthesis (( rather than a square bracket [[.](streamdown:incomplete-link)

  3. Step 3

    Integer solutions: \text{Integer solutions: } -2, -1, 0, 1, 2, 3, 4   ⟹  \implies Smallest integer is \text{Smallest integer is } -2

    Correct

    Integer solutions: \text{Integer solutions: } -1, 0, 1, 2, 3, 4   ⟹  \implies Smallest integer is \text{Smallest integer is } -1

    Because of the bracket error in the previous step, you included −2-2 in the set of solutions. Since x>−2x > -2, the smallest valid integer is −1-1.

WHAT YOU DID WELL
Compliments from Your Teacher

You isolated the variable term correctly by subtracting 33 from each section.

You correctly flipped the inequality signs when dividing across by −4-4.

THE ERROR
Where Your ACEpath Teacher Spotted the Mistake
Strict vs. Non-Strict Endpoint Confusion

no

WHY IT HAPPENED
ACEpath Teacher's Diagnosis

You treated the strict boundary x>−2x > -2 as inclusive, confusing the round parenthesis required for strict inequalities with the square bracket used for non-strict inequalities.

REASONING PATH
Your ACEpath teacher’s suggested approach
Strict vs. Non-Strict Intervals
  • Strict inequalities (<< and >>) exclude the boundary point and use parentheses ()( ), whereas non-strict inequalities (≤\le and ≥\ge) include the boundary point and use square brackets [][ ].

  • Always inspect each endpoint symbol individually before choosing between a parenthesis and a bracket.

Integer Testing at Open Boundaries
  • An endpoint bounded by a strict inequality (x>ax > a) cannot be equal to aa.

  • Check whether the boundary value satisfies the original inequality: −2>−2-2 > -2 is false, so −2-2 cannot be a solution.

CORRECTED PATH
ACEpath Teacher's Demonstration
  1. Observe that −2<x-2 < x means −2-2 is excluded, so the left endpoint must use a round parenthesis: (−2(-2.

  2. Observe that x≤4x \le 4 means 44 is included, so the right endpoint must use a square bracket: 4]4].

  3. Combine them into the interval (−2,4](-2, 4].

  4. List the integers strictly greater than −2-2 and up to 44: {−1,0,1,2,3,4}\{-1, 0, 1, 2, 3, 4\}.

  5. Select the smallest integer from the set: −1-1.

Final answer

Interval: (−2,4](-2, 4]; Smallest integer: −1-1

NEXT STEPS
Final Takeaways from Your Teacher
  • Review interval notation conventions: use parentheses ()( ) for << and >>, and square brackets [][ ] for ≤\le and ≥\ge.

  • When finding the smallest or largest integer in an open interval, test the boundary value directly to confirm whether it satisfies the strict inequality.

  • Complete the three targeted flashcards and practice problems below to master interval endpoint boundaries.

OverviewACEpath Teacher's Diagnosis

03 The student adds 3 instead of subtracting 3 when isolating the x-term across the compound inequality.

Sample Student Work

Reviewed by ACEpath Teacher
Step-by-Step Review
Walk Through It with Your Teacher
Incorrect
  1. Step 1

    -13 ≤\le 3 - 4x < 11   ⟹  \implies -10 ≤\le -4x < 14

    Correct

    -13 - 3 ≤\le -4x < 11 - 3   ⟹  \implies -16 ≤\le -4x < 8

    To eliminate the constant +3+3 in the middle expression 3−4x3 - 4x, you must subtract 33 from each part of the compound inequality, rather than adding 33.

  2. Step 2

    2.5 ≥\ge x > -3.5   ⟹  \implies -3.5 < x ≤\le 2.5

    Correct

    −16−4\frac{-16}{-4} ≥\ge x > 8−4\frac{8}{-4}   ⟹  \implies -2 < x ≤\le 4

    Your division by −4-4 and sign reversal were executed correctly, but the values were shifted due to the arithmetic error in the previous step.

  3. Step 3

    Solution set: (−3.5,2.5]\text{Solution set: } (-3.5, 2.5]

    Correct

    (-2, 4]

    You correctly converted your compound inequality into interval notation with an open left boundary and closed right boundary, but the endpoints reflect the earlier error.

  4. Step 4

    Integer solutions: \text{Integer solutions: } -3, -2, -1, 0, 1, 2   ⟹  \implies Smallest integer is \text{Smallest integer is } -3

    Correct

    Integer solutions: \text{Integer solutions: } {\{-1, 0, 1, 2, 3, 4}\}   ⟹  \implies Smallest integer is \text{Smallest integer is } -1

    You correctly identified the integers within your interval (−3.5,2.5](-3.5, 2.5], but the true interval (−2,4](-2, 4] excludes −2-2 and has −1-1 as its smallest integer solution.

WHAT YOU DID WELL
Compliments from Your Teacher

You correctly recognized that dividing by a negative coefficient reverses both inequality symbols.

You properly converted strict and non-strict inequalities into interval notation using parentheses and square brackets.

You accurately listed the integers belonging to your computed interval and picked the minimum value.

THE ERROR
Where Your ACEpath Teacher Spotted the Mistake
Inverse Operation Error

You added 3 to each part instead of subtracting 3 to isolate the −4x-4x term.

WHY IT HAPPENED
ACEpath Teacher's Diagnosis

Confusing the sign of the constant term +3+3 with the negative sign on −4x-4x, leading to applying addition instead of the required subtraction to undo +3+3.

REASONING PATH
Your ACEpath teacher’s suggested approach
Identify the operation needed to cancel the constant
  • In an expression of the form c−axc - ax, the constant term cc is positive; undo it by subtracting cc, not adding cc.

  • Look at the sign in front of the constant term before choosing the operation to apply across all parts.

CORRECTED PATH
ACEpath Teacher's Demonstration
  1. Subtract 33 from all three parts: −13−3≤−4x<11−3-13 - 3 \le -4x < 11 - 3, giving −16≤−4x<8-16 \le -4x < 8.

  2. Divide all parts by −4-4 and reverse the inequality signs: 4≥x>−24 \ge x > -2, which rewrites as −2<x≤4-2 < x \le 4.

  3. Write the solution in interval notation: (−2,4](-2, 4].

  4. List the integer solutions in (−2,4](-2, 4]: {−1,0,1,2,3,4}\{-1, 0, 1, 2, 3, 4\}.

Final answer

Interval: (−2,4](-2, 4]; Smallest integer: −1-1

NEXT STEPS
Final Takeaways from Your Teacher
  • Check the sign of each isolated constant term carefully before deciding whether to add or subtract.

  • Always substitute a quick test value from your final interval back into the original inequality to catch arithmetic shifts early.

Lock it in

Similar question

01

Solve the compound inequality −7<5−2x≤9-7 < 5 - 2x \le 9 for real numbers xx. State the solution set in interval notation.

Answer

[−2,6)[-2, 6). Subtract 55 across all parts: −12<−2x≤4-12 < -2x \le 4. Divide by −2-2 and flip signs: 6>x≥−26 > x \ge -2, or −2≤x<6-2 \le x < 6.](streamdown:incomplete-link)

02

Solve the compound inequality −11≤1−3x<13-11 \le 1 - 3x < 13. State the solution set in interval notation and find the smallest integer xx in the set.

Answer

Interval: (−4,4](-4, 4]; Smallest integer: −3-3. Subtract 11: −12≤−3x<12-12 \le -3x < 12. Divide by −3-3 and flip signs: 4≥x>−44 \ge x > -4, so −4<x≤4-4 < x \le 4. The smallest integer strictly greater than −4-4 is −3-3.

03

Solve the compound inequality −2<4−x3≤2-2 < \frac{4 - x}{3} \le 2. Express the solution in interval notation and identify how many integers satisfy the inequality.

Answer

Interval: [−2,10)[-2, 10); Number of integers: 12. Multiply by 33: −6<4−x≤6-6 < 4 - x \le 6. Subtract 44: −10<−x≤2-10 < -x \le 2. Multiply by −1-1 and flip signs: 10>x≥−210 > x \ge -2, meaning [−2,10)[-2, 10). The integer solutions are −2,−1,…,9-2, -1, \dots, 9, giving 9−(−2)+1=129 - (-2) + 1 = 12 integers.](streamdown:incomplete-link)

Loading workspace…