Resources
Consider the equation . Solve for all valid real values of , or explain why an algebraically derived candidate must be excluded.
Answer and steps
Final answer
No solution ( is an extraneous root resulting from the initial domain restriction , but solving yields , which satisfies ; hence is the unique valid solution).
Steps
Identify the domain restriction
To solve the equation and determine any valid solutions or extraneous candidates, follow these steps:
The left-hand side contains the rational expression . A fraction is undefined when its denominator is zero:
Thus, the domain of the equation consists of all real numbers except . Any algebraic solution that equals would be extraneous and must be discarded.
Simplify the rational expression
Factor the difference of squares in the numerator:
Under the condition , the common factor can be safely canceled:
The original equation simplifies to a linear equation:
Solve the linear equation
Isolate the variable :
Verify against the domain restriction
Compare the candidate solution to the domain condition:
- The derived candidate is .
- Since , the candidate does not make the original denominator zero.
Substitute back into the original equation to check:
- Left-hand side:
- Right-hand side:
Both sides evaluate to . Therefore, is the unique valid real solution.
Typical errors
01 A student cancels terms across addition and subtraction by incorrectly dividing x² by x and 16 by 4.
Sample Student Work
Reviewed by ACEpath TeacherStep-by-Step Review
Walk Through It with Your Teacher- Step 1
- = 3x - 10 x - 4 = 3x - 10
Correct= 3x - 10 x + 4 = 3x - 10 ()
You split the rational expression into . Denominators cannot be split term-by-term across addition or subtraction. Instead, factor the numerator as and cancel the common factor .
- Step 2
-2x = -6 x = 3
Correct2x = 14 x = 7
Your algebraic solving steps were executed correctly from your equation , but the value is incorrect due to the invalid fraction simplification in Step 1.
WHAT YOU DID WELL
Compliments from Your TeacherYou correctly solved the two-step linear equation once you reached .
You correctly simplified the isolated monomial quotients and .
THE ERROR
Where Your ACEpath Teacher Spotted the MistakeYou split a multi-term denominator across subtraction by dividing individual numerator terms by individual denominator terms.
WHY IT HAPPENED
ACEpath Teacher's DiagnosisYou treated the denominator as two independent divisors rather than a single grouped quantity. A fraction cannot be decomposed into ; simplifying rational expressions requires factoring the entire numerator and denominator and canceling identical common factors.
REASONING PATH
Your ACEpath teacher’s suggested approach- Group multi-term denominators
A multi-term denominator like represents a single grouped factor and cannot be divided term-by-term.
Always place parentheses around polynomial denominators like before simplifying.
- Factor before canceling
Only factors common to the entire numerator and denominator can be canceled, never individual terms separated by or .
Factor as , note , and cancel the entire factor .
CORRECTED PATH
ACEpath Teacher's DemonstrationIdentify the restriction: .
Factor the numerator as a difference of squares: .
Divide out the common factor to obtain .
Rearrange to solve for : .
Confirm that satisfies the domain restriction .
02 A student incorrectly factors the difference of squares as (x - 4)² instead of (x - 4)(x + 4).
Sample Student Work
Reviewed by ACEpath TeacherStep-by-Step Review
Walk Through It with Your Teacher- Step 1
= 3x - 10 x - 4 = 3x - 10
Correct= 3x - 10 x + 4 = 3x - 10 ()
The numerator is a difference of two squares, , which factors into . Factoring it as incorrectly introduces a middle term since .
- Step 2
6 = 2x
Correct14 = 2x
You rearranged your linear equation correctly by adding and subtracting , but the numbers were carried over from the earlier factoring error.
- Step 3
x = 3
Correctx = 7
Your division is correct for your intermediate equation, but because of the initial factoring error, this final value does not satisfy the original problem.
WHAT YOU DID WELL
Compliments from Your TeacherYou recognized that the fraction on the left-hand side could be simplified by dividing out a common factor.
You correctly simplified your rational expression to .
You solved your linear equation with correct algebraic moves to isolate .
THE ERROR
Where Your ACEpath Teacher Spotted the MistakeYou factored the binomial as rather than .
WHY IT HAPPENED
ACEpath Teacher's DiagnosisConfusing the difference of two squares identity with the square of a binomial .
REASONING PATH
Your ACEpath teacher’s suggested approach- Identify the Form
Two terms separated by subtraction where both terms are perfect squares form a difference of squares: .
Always write as with opposite signs in the two factors.
- Check by Expanding
Expanding gives , which has a non-zero middle linear term.
Mentally multiply your factors back out to verify that no unwanted middle term appears.
CORRECTED PATH
ACEpath Teacher's DemonstrationFactor the numerator using the difference of squares: .
State the domain restriction: .
Cancel the common non-zero factor : .
Collect variable terms on one side and constants on the other: .
Divide by to obtain , which satisfies the domain condition .
x = 7
03 A student multiplies both sides by (x - 4) and expands incorrectly, treating (3x - 10)(x - 4) as 3x² - 14x + 40 by adding the inner and outer coefficients incorrectly.
Sample Student Work
Reviewed by ACEpath TeacherStep-by-Step Review
Walk Through It with Your Teacher- Step 1
- Step 2
- Step 3Correct
(reject because )
The original equation contains the denominator , which requires . Substituting leads to division by zero, making an extraneous solution. Only is valid.
WHAT YOU DID WELL
Compliments from Your TeacherYou expanded into without sign or arithmetic errors.
You rearranged the equation into standard quadratic form and divided through by 2 correctly.
You factored into correctly.
THE ERROR
Where Your ACEpath Teacher Spotted the MistakeYou listed both algebraic roots without checking if either value makes any original denominator equal to zero.
WHY IT HAPPENED
ACEpath Teacher's DiagnosisMultiplying both sides of a rational equation by a variable factor can introduce extraneous roots. When an algebraic candidate makes an original denominator vanish, it must be excluded from the solution set.
REASONING PATH
Your ACEpath teacher’s suggested approach- Establish the Domain First
Every denominator in a rational equation must be non-zero.
Set each denominator equal to zero at the very beginning to identify excluded values, such as .
- Filter Algebraic Candidates
Any candidate that violates the domain is extraneous.
Compare all final candidates against your excluded values and discard any match before writing the final solution set.
CORRECTED PATH
ACEpath Teacher's DemonstrationSet the original denominator to zero to find the restricted value: , so .
Check the candidates and against the restriction .
Discard the extraneous candidate , leaving as the unique valid solution.
(with excluded as extraneous)
Lock it in
Can you rewrite as ?
No. Division does not distribute across addition or subtraction in the denominator. A denominator like is a single grouped divisor.
Similar question
Solve for all valid values of :
Answer
Domain restriction: . Factor numerator: . Equate and solve: . Since , the solution is .
Solve for all valid values of , identifying any extraneous candidates:
Answer
Domain restriction: . Factor numerator: . Equate and solve: . Since , the unique solution is .
Solve for all valid values of , or state if no valid solution exists:
Answer
Domain restriction: . Factor numerator: . Simplify fraction: . Equate and solve: . Since the candidate violates the domain restriction , it is extraneous. Therefore, there is no valid real solution.