Resources
Solve the following multi-step linear inequality for : . Express the solution in interval notation.
Answer and steps
Final answer
No solution (or )
Steps
Expand both sides using the distributive property
To solve the inequality for , follow these algebraic steps:
Distribute the factors outside the parentheses across the terms inside:
4(2x - 3) - 5x &\ge 3(x + 4) - 8 \\ 8x - 12 - 5x &\ge 3x + 12 - 8 \end{aligned}$$Combine like terms on each side
On the left-hand side, combine the variable terms :
On the right-hand side, combine the constant terms :
Setting these back into the inequality gives:
Eliminate the variable term from both sides
Subtract from both sides to collect the variable terms:
3x - 12 - 3x &\ge 3x + 4 - 3x \\ -12 &\ge 4 \end{aligned}$$Interpret the resulting statement
The variable has been eliminated, leaving the numerical comparison:
Since is less than , this inequality is false for all real values of . A false statement independent of means there is no value of that can satisfy the original inequality.
Therefore, the inequality has no solution, which in set notation is represented as the empty set:
Typical errors
01 The student misidentifies a contradiction with eliminating variables as having all real numbers as solutions rather than no solution.
Sample Student Work
Reviewed by ACEpath TeacherStep-by-Step Review
Walk Through It with Your Teacher- Step 1
8x - 12 - 5x 3x + 12 - 8 3x - 12 3x + 4
- Step 2
- Step 3Correct
The statement is mathematically false. When variable elimination leads to a false inequality (a contradiction), there is no value of that satisfies it, so the solution is no solution (or ), not .
WHAT YOU DID WELL
Compliments from Your TeacherYou expanded the expressions using the distributive property without sign errors.
You combined variable and constant terms accurately on each side.
You subtracted from both sides correctly to arrive at .
THE ERROR
Where Your ACEpath Teacher Spotted the MistakeYou solved all the algebra perfectly down to , but you wrote instead of recognizing that the false inequality means there are no solutions.
WHY IT HAPPENED
ACEpath Teacher's DiagnosisYou confused a contradiction (an inequality that is always false, meaning no solution) with an identity (an inequality that is always true, meaning all real numbers).
REASONING PATH
Your ACEpath teacher’s suggested approach- Evaluate the constant inequality
After variables eliminate, ask: Is the remaining numerical statement true or false?
Check the numbers directly: is less than , so is false.
- Match the truth value to the solution set
A false numerical statement means no real can make the inequality true.
If the statement is false, conclude 'no solution' or . If the statement is true (such as ), conclude .
CORRECTED PATH
ACEpath Teacher's DemonstrationCompare the values on both sides: is smaller than , so is a false statement.
Since the statement is false for every value of , no real numbers satisfy the inequality.
Write the final solution set as no solution, or .
No solution (or )
02 The student fails to distribute the multiplication to the constant term inside the parentheses, altering the constant comparison to a true inequality.
Sample Student Work
Reviewed by ACEpath TeacherStep-by-Step Review
Walk Through It with Your Teacher- Step 1
8x - 3 - 5x 3x + 4 - 8
Correct8x - 12 - 5x 3x + 12 - 8
When applying the distributive property , you must multiply the outside factor by every term inside the parentheses. On the left side, (not ). On the right side, (not ).
- Step 2
3x - 3 3x - 4
Correct3x - 12 3x + 4
You combined like terms correctly on both sides ( and ), but the terms carried over the earlier distribution error.
- Step 3Correct
You correctly subtracted from both sides, but the resulting numbers were affected by the earlier distribution mistake.
- Step 4Correct
While is indeed always true, the correct simplified inequality is , which is a contradiction (false for all ). Therefore, the true solution set is the empty set, .
WHAT YOU DID WELL
Compliments from Your TeacherYou correctly combined the variable terms and constant terms on each side of the inequality.
You correctly eliminated the variable term from both sides by subtracting .
You correctly recognized that a universally true statement like corresponds to .
THE ERROR
Where Your ACEpath Teacher Spotted the MistakeYou only multiplied the outside factor by the variable term and left the constant term unmultiplied on both sides.
WHY IT HAPPENED
ACEpath Teacher's DiagnosisIncomplete application of the distributive property across grouped binomials, leading to an incorrect constant comparison and reversing the truth value of the final numerical statement.
REASONING PATH
Your ACEpath teacher’s suggested approach- Full Distribution Check
Every term inside parentheses must be multiplied by the factor outside: .
Draw distribution arrows or underline each internal term before removing parentheses to verify that the constants are also multiplied.
- Truth Value Interpretation
When variables cancel out completely: a true numerical statement (e.g., ) means , while a false statement (e.g., ) means no solution ().
Always double-check the arithmetic of constant terms when variables cancel out entirely.
CORRECTED PATH
ACEpath Teacher's DemonstrationCombine like terms on each side: .
Subtract from both sides: .
Observe that is a false statement for all real numbers.
No solution (or )
03 The student forgets to apply the negative sign when distributing across the second term inside the parentheses, resulting in a false condition that keeps a variable term.
Sample Student Work
Reviewed by ACEpath TeacherStep-by-Step Review
Walk Through It with Your Teacher- Step 1
8x + 12 - 5x 3x + 12 - 8
Correct8x - 12 - 5x 3x + 12 - 8
When distributing across , multiplying by yields , not .
- Step 2
3x + 12 3x + 4
Correct3x - 12 3x + 4
You combined like terms correctly on both sides ( and ), but the carried forward from the expansion error.
- Step 3Correct
You correctly subtracted from both sides, but the remaining constant on the left should be , not .
- Step 4Correct
Because the true inequality is , which is false for all real numbers, there is no solution rather than all real numbers.
WHAT YOU DID WELL
Compliments from Your TeacherYou correctly applied the distributive property to the right-hand expression .
You combined variable and constant terms on both sides accurately.
You correctly eliminated the variable term from both sides.
You correctly understood that a universally true numerical statement corresponds to .
THE ERROR
Where Your ACEpath Teacher Spotted the MistakeYou wrote instead of when multiplying .
WHY IT HAPPENED
ACEpath Teacher's DiagnosisOverlooking the negative sign inside during distribution reversed the sign of the constant term, converting a false statement () into a true statement ().
REASONING PATH
Your ACEpath teacher’s suggested approach- Sign Tracking in Distribution
Circle the sign in front of each term inside parentheses before multiplying.
- Special Case Interpretation
False statement without variables ; True statement without variables
Always double-check the constant terms whenever all variable terms cancel out.
CORRECTED PATH
ACEpath Teacher's DemonstrationDistribute correctly on the left: .
Distribute on the right: .
Combine like terms: .
Subtract from both sides: .
Notice that is false for all .
Lock it in
When solving an inequality and all variables cancel out, how do you determine the solution?
Look at the remaining numerical statement: if it is true, the solution is all real numbers, ; if it is false, there is no solution, .
Similar question
Solve the inequality for and express the solution in interval notation: .
Answer
. Expanding gives . Since is always true, the inequality holds for all real numbers: .
Solve the inequality for and express the solution in interval notation: .
Answer
No solution (or ). Expanding both sides gives . Subtracting gives . Since is false, there is no solution.
Solve the inequality for and express the solution in interval notation: .
Answer
. Multiply all terms by to clear denominators: . Since is true, the solution is all real numbers: .