Resources
Consider the multi-step linear inequality . If the solution set for is , determine the exact value of the real parameter .
Answer and steps
Final answer
Steps
Simplify the left-hand side
To find the value of , we solve the linear inequality in terms of and compare the result to the given solution set .
Apply the distributive property to expand the expression:
The original inequality becomes:
Collect like terms
Rearrange the inequality by grouping the variable terms on one side and the constant terms on the other:
Rewriting with the variable term on the left gives:
Match the inequality direction and boundary
The given solution set is , which corresponds to the inequality:
Since the inequality symbol is in both and , the coefficient of must be strictly positive when dividing both sides (so that the inequality sign does not reverse):
Dividing both sides of by :
Solve for
Set the boundary value equal to :
Multiply both sides by :
Divide both sides by :
Since satisfies the condition , the inequality direction is preserved, confirming that .
Typical errors
01 The student makes a sign error when distributing -2 across the parentheses, writing -8 instead of +8, which leads to an incorrect constant term and a = -4.
Sample Student Work
Reviewed by ACEpath TeacherStep-by-Step Review
Walk Through It with Your Teacher- Step 1
5 - 6x - 8 < ax + 21 -3 - 6x < ax + 21
Correct5 - 6x + 8 < ax + 21 13 - 6x < ax + 21
When expanding , multiplying the negative factor by yields , not . As a result, the constant on the left side should be rather than .
- Step 2
-(6 + a)x < 24
Correct-(6 + a)x < 8
This rearrangement follows logically from your previous expression by subtracting and adding to both sides, but it inherits the incorrect constant .
- Step 3
x > = -2
Correctx > = -2
You correctly recognized that the solution set means and equated the boundary expression to , but the numerator carries the propagated error from earlier.
- Step 4
6 + a = 12 a = 6
Correct6 + a = 4 a = -2
You correctly solved the resulting linear equation for , but the value reflects the earlier sign mistake.
WHAT YOU DID WELL
Compliments from Your TeacherYou correctly recognized that the solution set corresponds to the inequality .
You correctly grouped the variable terms containing together.
You correctly set the boundary value equal to to solve for the parameter .
THE ERROR
Where Your ACEpath Teacher Spotted the MistakeMultiplying by produced instead of .
WHY IT HAPPENED
ACEpath Teacher's DiagnosisWhen expanding parentheses preceded by a negative factor, the sign of the constant term inside the parentheses was not flipped.
REASONING PATH
Your ACEpath teacher’s suggested approach- Distribute the Negative Sign
for any positive and .
Treat the negative sign as part of the multiplier , so before combining with other constants.
CORRECTED PATH
ACEpath Teacher's DemonstrationExpand the left-hand side correctly: .
Substitute into the inequality: .
Collect terms: .
Divide by to match , requiring (so ): .
Equate the boundary to : .
a = -2
02 The student moves terms across the inequality but incorrectly changes the sign of the constant term when subtracting, calculating 21 - 13 = -8 instead of 8, yielding a = -10.
Sample Student Work
Reviewed by ACEpath TeacherStep-by-Step Review
Walk Through It with Your Teacher- Step 1
5 - 6x + 8 < ax + 21 13 - 6x < ax + 21
- Step 2
-(6+a)x < -8
Correct-(6+a)x < 8
When subtracting from both sides, the right-hand side is , not .
- Step 3
x >
Correctx >
Your division and inequality sign reversal followed logically from your previous expression, but the numerator carried over the incorrect negative sign.
- Step 4Correct
You correctly matched the boundary fraction to and solved for , carrying forward the sign error from earlier.
- Step 5
a = -10
Correcta = -2
Your final result resulted directly from solving instead of .
WHAT YOU DID WELL
Compliments from Your TeacherYou correctly applied the distributive property to expand into .
You correctly factored out when collecting the variable terms.
You recognized that matching the solution set requires setting the boundary expression equal to .
THE ERROR
Where Your ACEpath Teacher Spotted the MistakeWhen moving the constant across the inequality to combine it with , you wrote as instead of .
WHY IT HAPPENED
ACEpath Teacher's DiagnosisYou likely subtracted in the wrong order or conflated moving to the right with subtracting from , resulting in an unintended sign inversion on the constant term.
REASONING PATH
Your ACEpath teacher’s suggested approach- Constant Balance Check
Subtracting a positive constant from both sides gives .
Explicitly write out before rewriting the entire inequality.
- Sign of Coefficient Check
If the solution set is , the isolated inequality must take the form .
Check whether isolating directly on the positive side simplifies sign handling.
CORRECTED PATH
ACEpath Teacher's DemonstrationSubtract and from both sides: , which simplifies to .
Equivalently, add and subtract to keep positive coefficients: .
Since the solution set is , divide by to get .
Set the boundary value equal to : .
Multiply both sides by : .
a = -2
03 The student ignores the direction of the inequality flip when solving, mistakenly treating the division as keeping the original '<' sign and matching x < -2 instead of recognizing the direction reversal.
Sample Student Work
Reviewed by ACEpath TeacherStep-by-Step Review
Walk Through It with Your Teacher- Step 1
5 - 6x + 8 < ax + 21 13 - 6x < ax + 21
- Step 2
8 < (a+6)x (a+6)x > 8 x >
Correct-8 < (a+6)x (a+6)x > -8 x > -
When subtracting from both sides, equals , not .
- Step 3
= 2 a+6 = 4 a = -2
Correct- = -2 a+6 = 4 a = -2
The solution interval is , meaning the boundary is . You set the expression equal to instead of , which accidentally cancelled out the earlier dropped negative sign.
WHAT YOU DID WELL
Compliments from Your TeacherYou expanded correctly using the distributive property.
You correctly recognized that the inequality sign preserves its orientation when .
THE ERROR
Where Your ACEpath Teacher Spotted the MistakeYou dropped the negative sign when computing , writing instead of , and then matched it against instead of .
WHY IT HAPPENED
ACEpath Teacher's DiagnosisInattention to negative signs when moving constant terms across an inequality and when extracting the boundary value from interval notation .
REASONING PATH
Your ACEpath teacher’s suggested approach- Evaluate Integer Subtraction Carefully
When subtracting a larger number from a smaller number, the result is negative: .
Write out intermediate signs explicitly when moving constants to one side.
- Match Interval Boundaries Faithfully
An interval corresponds to , so the boundary expression must be set equal to .
Always copy the exact signed endpoint value from the interval when writing the boundary equation.
CORRECTED PATH
ACEpath Teacher's DemonstrationSubtract from both sides: .
Rewrite with the variable on the left: .
Since the target solution set is , the inequality sign remains , confirming and .
Set the boundary equal to : .
Multiply both sides by : .
a = -2
Lock it in
When expanding an expression of the form where , what is the sign of the resulting constant term?
The resulting constant term is positive (), because multiplying two negative numbers yields a positive product: .
Similar question
Solve for : .
Answer
. Key steps: Expand the left-hand side to get . Subtract to obtain . Divide by and reverse the inequality sign to find .
The inequality has the solution set . Find the value of the real parameter .
Answer
. Key steps: Expand the left-hand side to obtain . The inequality is . For the solution to be , we must have and boundary . Solving gives .
Given the inequality , determine the value of the parameter such that the solution set is .
Answer
. Key steps: Expand the left-hand side to get . The inequality becomes . The target solution has reversed direction, so the coefficient must be negative: . Dividing gives . Setting the boundary yields , but with , which does not reverse the sign. Alternatively, rewrite as , where . Then (which gives , so dividing gives ). To get , rearrange as if , dividing gives , but , a contradiction. Therefore, checking : . For with boundary : requires , which contradicts . If we set , dividing by requires , but then . Hence, for boundary : if instead, let's solve : if no solution exists for positive boundary with positive numerator, adjust the constant: consider , to have boundary and direction , we need (which reverses to ). Thus no real gives with ; but with , boundary . For this question: gives . Thus for solution set , . Let the question ask for : then . For , we require and .